Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The Big Lie

Joseph Goebbels (shown above on the right) earned a Ph.D. from Heidelberg University and worked for a time as a writer and journalist. He excelled at delivering anti-Semitic speeches, and in 1933 was appointed Propaganda Minister for the Nazi Party in Germany.

Dr. Goebbels was a practitioner of Adolf Hitler’s “Big Lie” technique, detailed in Hitler’s 1925 book, Mein Kampf. The terminology relates to using repetition to reinforce a propaganda message. Congressman Steve Cohen ties it to Republicans and the current healthcare debate:

They say it’s a government takeover of healthcare — a big lie, just like Goebbels. You say it enough — you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie — and eventually people believe it.

Like “Blood Libel” — that’s the same kind of thing. The Germans said enough about the Jews, and the people believed it, and you had the Holocaust. You tell a lie over and over again.

And we’ve heard it on this floor: “Government takeover of healthcare.”
Congressman Cohen (shown above on the left) represents the 9th Congressional District in Tennessee. This includes people in and around the city of Memphis. More than half the voters in that area apparently support his point of view and return him to office.

I think Representative Cohen misrepresents the idea of the “Big Lie.” In Germany, it was used to foster the notion that people of the Jewish faith were “bad people.” With repetition, the idea became a part of the German belief system, and the mass killing of these “bad people” was deemed necessary. We have seen the “Big Lie” technique used more recently to justify the killing of Cambodians in the 1970s and the killing of Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994. It is an unsettling political tool.

When you look at the “Big Lie” as a tool used by political leaders to marginalize a portion of the population, you begin to understand what Representative Cohen is doing. He expands on the Democratic Party theme that “Republicans are bad people” and moves beyond the “racist, homophobic, bigoted” characterizations into the even more disturbing area of “killers and liars.” This is the rhetoric that colors our healthcare debate. Representative Cohen paints Republicans as being bad people, and reinforces the “ghouls and sub-human” characterizations used by Keith Olbermann.

Do you think Congressman Cohen senses the irony? He is our current manifestation of the “Big Lie” and yet he accuses his political targets of being the ones who use that tool.

This is true “political hardball.”

Does it work? We have ringside seats in the arena, and will get to watch as events unfold. Here is a scorecard:

--Republicans are concerned about the administration of our nation’s healthcare system by government agencies. Republicans are also concerned about whether or not it is right to force every citizen to buy an insurance product, and whether it is right to allow our Executive Branch to grant legislative exceptions and waivers to favored entities. If Republicans are characterized as killers and liars, will their concerns be heard?

--Republicans are concerned about the sanctity of our voting process and whether it is right to allow non-citizens to vote. If Republicans are characterized as xenophobic liars, will their concerns be heard?

--Republicans are concerned that our climate debate is being influenced by data that is erroneously adjusted and by restricted views of that data. Republicans see the adjustments as skewing the data rather than normalizing it, and they see the restricted views as distorting the issue rather than clarifying it. If Republicans are characterized as non-conforming liars will their concerns be heard?

While Representative Cohen feels comfortable in characterizing Republicans as bad people, this effort does not encourage the free exchange of ideas. Rather, it stifles debate.

But then, that’s the idea. Our culture sees Republicans as a problem to be eliminated, and endorses the “Big Lie” as a valid tool in that effort.

Are you still not sure this is really happening in the good old United States of America? Here’s a short test:

Recently, a Congressman from the state of New York resigned his office because of a public exchange he had with a potential sexual partner in Washington, DC. Chris Lee, the former Representative, is 46 years old, is married and has one child. Chris Lee is also a Republican.

When you saw the news, did you think, “This guy has some major problems!”

Or did you think, “That figures. He’s a Republican.”

I know, I know: Keep moving. There’s nothing to see here. Just move on...

Linked by LeftCoastRebel!  Thanks, Tim.

UPDATE 2/17/2011:
Victor Davis Hanson has a compilation of some of the anti-Republican rhetoric of not-too-long-ago. Note that our culture has no problem with "civility" during a Republican administration.

UPDATE 2/23/2011:
This post from the Hot Air Green Room makes an important distinction about characterizing something as a "lie":
The point here is not that PolitiFact’s claim is a lie, or that PolitiFact is biased (although the latter is fairly obvious). Rather, the point is that the question of whether ObamaCare is a government takeover of the healthcare system is one of political opinion, not a simple question of fact.

UPDATE 8/22/2013:
Yid with Lid takes offense at the characterizations made by Representative Jim Clyburn (D-SC).  Congressman Clyburn seems to share the view of Congressman Cohen that Republicans are Nazis.

Return to Top

Return to Bottom

Thursday, February 3, 2011

The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How will it end?

Michelangelo’s Pietà in the Basilica of Saint Peter, Vatican City

Here is a paragraph taken from remarks made by Sarah Palin in a Facebook post on August 7, 2009:
The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.
This is the post that brought into our national discussion the idea of rationing health care services. It created a cultural sense of outrage toward Mrs. Palin. Her transgression: Advancing an idea.

Well, really, it’s more than that. She is a person who has obtained political power by giving voice to our founding principles. Furthermore, she is a person “of The People” and not “of The Establishment.”

This circumstance is confounding to our culture. People in West Hollywood hang her in effigy. A rock band stages her disembowelment. A theater director in Montana modifies the lyrics to “The Mikado” and calls for her beheading.

And in case you’ve missed it, there is a sexist tone to the aspersions cast on the former governor and mother of five. Tracy Morgan sees her as great “masturbation material.” Wikipedia uses her as an example to describe the acronym “MILF.”

You would think that there would be institutional elements within our culture that would rise to her defense. Maybe our clergy would use her treatment as a lead-in to a sermon on the Golden Rule?

No, that is too polarizing and might be “uncivil.”

Maybe those in academic circles would take note of this unusual cultural “feeding frenzy” and begin research studies?

Not so. Our post-secondary academics see the treatment of Sarah Palin as “right and natural.” One senses their imposition of the classic rape defense: She asked for it.

I am astonished that we are seeing this kind of cultural persecution in America. It is truly something that has not occurred in nearly 2,000 years. A long time ago, a person of the people acquired political power by advancing ideas. This was seen (accurately) as a threat to the establishment, and a cultural event conveniently solved the issue.

Sarah Palin has acquired political power, and our culture is hell-bent to destroy that power. It is being done with extreme imagery and false accusations. A recent example is the Arizona shooting incident where our culture claimed that Mrs. Palin’s prior actions instigated the deaths of six individuals.

Although the accusation was false, our culture sees the accusation as “just.” That distinction between what is true and what “needs to be done” should cause concern.

Of the individuals arrayed against Mrs. Palin, most would say they simply have an intense dislike of her. That characterization can be examined in the context of the anonymous comments and death threats Mrs. Palin receives. Those messages don’t convey “dislike.” They convey raw hatred.

What to make of all of this?

Our culture partakes in savage indecency directed at one human being in America.

And that’s ok. She’s a Republican.

UPDATE 2/4/2001:
Linked by Texas for Sarah Palin!  Thanks, Josh.

UPDATE 3/9/2011:
The toll on the family of the targeted individual should not be ignored.  Here's a story on Chuck and Sally Heath.

UPDATE 5/10/2011:
Our justice system seems weirdly emasculated as it attempts to afford protection to public figures.

UPDATE 5/25/2011:
Real Clear Politics has a scoop on "The Undefeated!"

UPDATE 9/19/2011:
Left Coast Rebel has a roundup of reaction associated with recent comments by boxing legend Mike Tyson on Sarah Palin.  The fact that American journalistic ethics fosters this conduct in our culture is difficult to comprehend.  At long last, where is our sense of decency?

UPDATE 11/20/2013:
With apologies for the MSNBC advertisement you will have to watch if you wish to view this video, please watch Martin Bashir condemn Sarah Palin as a "world class idiot."

Return to Top

Return to Bottom